250 CVs per role. Interview the right 25.
Reads every CVChecks LinkedInRanks
A hiring team filling multiple roles · CVs, LinkedIn profiles, One-page shortlist
What changed, in numbers.
Interviews to fill 10 seats
Before
100 to 150
After
20 to 25
Screening a role
Before
7 to 10 days
After
Minutes
About 250
CVs scored per role
The problem.
Each role pulled in around 250 CVs. Reading them took a week or more, and to fill ten seats the team ended up interviewing 100 to 150 people.
It was costing them
- 7 to 10 days of screening per role
- 100 to 150 interviews to fill 10 seats
- Good candidates missed simply because of the order the CVs arrived in
How it works.
- 1It reads every CVAll of them, not the first fifty, against the actual job description.
- 2It adds the public profileLinkedIn and other public details fill in what the CV leaves out.
- 3It scores and ranksEach candidate gets a match score with the reasons behind it.
- 4It puts it on one pageHR sees who to interview first, with everything they need beside each name.
The result.
- 10 seats filled with 20 to 25 interviews instead of 100 to 150
- Screening that took 7 to 10 days now takes minutes
- Every applicant is read, so strong candidates don't get lost in the pile
“The number that got me was 100 interviews for 10 seats. Most of that time was spent learning what a good CV score would have said on day one.”
Akshat ShahFounder, built this oneIf your team reads hundreds of CVs to find a handful of people, let AI do the first read.